Macbook pro geekbench mac#

The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser.

Macbook pro geekbench mac#

Those who want that level of graphics performance or higher will be better off selecting an M1 Max MacBook Pro. Welcome to the Geekbench Mac Benchmark Chart. However, it is way behind the nearest Ampere SKU, the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, which is in the OpenCL chart with 45,898.

To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each Mac, the chart only includes Macs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. Recensione MacBook Pro 14 e 16 M2 Pro e M2 Max, il problema è che sono troppo potenti. Welcome to the Geekbench Mac Benchmark Chart. Ottimizzato per iOS 16 e i processori a A15. The M1 OpenCL scores position the Apple Silicon neatly between the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (36,196) and the GeForce GTX 1650 (38,361). Geekbench 5 è la quinta edizione del famoso test di Geekbench in versione per iPhone e iPad. The average Metal score for the M1 Pro with 16-core GPU over three separate records is 41,371 while a single entry reveals an OpenCL mark of 36,664 points (over 38,000 points has been reported though). This set of specs will be sufficient (and likely) overkill for a lot of you reading this. Yet again, the M1 Pro destroys anything by the M1, which is hardly a surprise considering the differences in GPU configuration. All the benchmarks below are for an M2 Pro chipset with a 12-core CPU, 19-core GPU and 32GB memory. The Apple SoC and its 10-core CPU has a +40.68% (single) and a +34.30% (multi) advantage over the 10-core Comet Lake desktop chip while not being nearly as power hungry.Īs for graphics, the M1 Pro has been tested in both OpenCL and Metal. 14 nm for the Intel processor) even allows the M1 Pro to demolish the Intel Core i9-10910 that can be found in the 2020 27-inch iMac. A more-refined manufacturing process (5 nm vs.

This would leave the new Apple Silicon at the top of the Geekbench Mac single-core chart while destroying anything with an M1 in it in the multi-core chart. That held true in tests like Geekbench 5 and Cinebench R23, where the M2 Max MacBook Pro 14-inch hit a new record in multi-core for a 14-inch laptop. Graphics speeds are up to 30 percent faster than that of M1 Pro, resulting in huge increases in image processing performance and enabling console-quality gaming.The M1 Pro tests show a score pattern of around 1,750 points for Geekbench 5 single-core and about 12,100 points for multi-core (current averages would have been artificially lowered by a seemingly outlier of a record). The GPU in M2 Pro can be configured with up to 19 cores - three more than the GPU in M1 Pro - and includes a larger L2 cache. Apps like Adobe Photoshop run heavy workloads faster than ever, and compiling in Xcode is up to 2.5x faster than on the fastest Intel-based MacBook Pro. The next-generation 10- or 12-core CPU consists of up to eight high-performance cores and four high-efficiency cores, resulting in multithreaded CPU performance that is up to 20 percent faster than the 10-core CPU in M1 Pro.

It features 200GB/s of unified memory bandwidth - twice that of M2 - and up to 32GB of low-latency unified memory.

Image source: Apple Inc.Īs the M2 Mac mini and the new M2 Pro and M2 Max MacBook Pro models aren’t available in the wild yet, we still need to wait a bit longer to get the proper results, but, so far, it’s already impressive the power that comes with these new processors.Īpple says the M2 Pro consists of 40 billion transistors - nearly 20 percent more than M1 Pro and double the amount in M2. The M1 Max, on the other hand, achieves 1,727 single-core and 12,643 multi-core scores.Ĭompared to the previous generation of Mac mini with the M1 chip, it would achieve a single-core score of 1,651 and a multi-core score of 5,181 – meaning Apple was able to improve three times better multi-core scores. The M2 Pro Mac mini with 16GB of RAM performed 1,952 single-core scores and 15,013 in multi-core score tests. Although the performance should vary when compared to the new MacBook Pro models, the results shouldn’t be that different. The scores (via MacRumors) show that the Mac mini with the M2 Pro was able to beat the M1 Max chip in single-core and multi-core scores.